There are many things a person can do for the enviornment. Some are easy to do while others are hard. Hard not because the task is hard, but because it is hard for the person to commit to doing the task as it interfers with their way of life and are unwilling to make that change.
There are already some things that a person can do that are very easy:
1. Reduce that amount of electrical power and natural gas use. This is very easy to do as all you have to do ia turn off any electrical power that you are not using. I do this too, I try to save as much electrical power as I can, not only because it helps save energy and money, but also because it reduces the amount of harmful pollutions that can lead to global warming.
2. Another thing that I find really easy to do is to recycle my garbage. All you have to do is seperate the garbage into three sections, paper, plastic, and the waste. It's Really easy and it makes it so that you don't need any raw materials that are used to make things. That's good because as i've said before it reduces the amount of harmful pollutions sent into the atmosphere.
3. Taking a shorter shower can also be beneficial as it saves a lot water. Turning off the tap while you brush, or are soaping the dishes is also a good method to save water. Every minute can make a difference and it's not something hard, its very easy thing to do.
There are many little everyday things that you can do to make a difference.
And some of those things that I do are :
1. use the library or buy second second hand books as a method of decreasing the amount of trees being cut down.
2. renting DVD'd instead of buying them, this also saves a lot of money.
3. and as i've mentioned before, saving water by using less water.
4. turn off the lights when I am not using them, it saves energy and money.
5. When I want to go somewhere, most times I either walk there (if it's not far) or use the metro to get there. This saves a lot of gas as if were to use a car to move around, it would use up a lot of gas and would also help pollute the air.
(#"s 3-5) Sometimes you have to get used to things to make them easy and that is how it was for me when I first started doing these things. They were a bit hard to get used to, as I sometimes forgot to turn off the lights or the water tap but after some time, they became natural to me and I got used to doing them.
Sunday, May 25, 2008
Sunday, May 18, 2008
Peer Sharing...
This week's blog is about looking over two papers and commenting on them.
The first paper is Brandon's paper (I used the 1st version as the other has not been uploaded onto blackboard)
From what I read the main point of the paper is the about the underlying racism ongoing in New Orleans
"This should have been no surprise because for all the cohesiveness New Orleans has exhibited, there is an underlying note of a racism brought about by years of bigotry from governing sanctions."
This might work as a thesis statement, but it seems kind of like there should be a bit more added to it. Another line or so.
I can see where the paper is going. At first he introduces the topic and then goes into the history of it. One thing about his paper is that it seems a bit raw in the version that I've read. While there is a lot of info, and does seem to be organized, some of the paragraphs seem very long and in need of being cut down. Another thing is that while he sources his material, he does not really give much information about the source.
One example of this: "According to, Racism and Resistance in New Orleans developed a three tiered racial hierarchy"
He doesn't tell the reader what "Racism and Resistance in New Orleans" is. It could be a book, an article, anything. I don't really know. One thing that he should do is mention what the source is, whether a book, an article or something else.
He doesn't seem to need help with grammer, but there are some mistakes, like the one in the quote given above. He didn't need to add the comma after "According to". Personally though I think that there might be something missing there that he forgot accidentally, like the type of source or the author's name.
The second paper is Rhodine's paper.
The focus of her paper seems to be on Environmental racism mainly in South Bronx.
To me, what seems to be closest to a thesis statement is:
"All these places of a couple of things in common, one they are all places of low income two they are places that get dumped on (literally). Let us focus on the South Bronx. There is a high number of waste facilities and transfer trucks that go through the South Bronx. This is causing some of the highest rates of asthma in the country. The Bronx River is getting better but still needs a lot of work. We as citizens of this city and the world should take action and help change this situation.
Environmental racism is when one particular group, usually people of low income have to take on the burden of caring for another group’s environmental mess. "
I know what her paper is about, but I think that she needs to add a sentence or two making the thesis statement clear. And add that before going into details about South Bronx. Maybe change the wording a bit.
The format of the paper seems okay, but I think that she should add the definition of Environmental racism before talking about South Bronx.
Overall her topic is really interesting to me and I would definitely like to read more of it to understand the subject better.
I don't really know if my opinions are good or helpful, but I've mentioned all of the issues that I found important about the papers.
The first paper is Brandon's paper (I used the 1st version as the other has not been uploaded onto blackboard)
From what I read the main point of the paper is the about the underlying racism ongoing in New Orleans
"This should have been no surprise because for all the cohesiveness New Orleans has exhibited, there is an underlying note of a racism brought about by years of bigotry from governing sanctions."
This might work as a thesis statement, but it seems kind of like there should be a bit more added to it. Another line or so.
I can see where the paper is going. At first he introduces the topic and then goes into the history of it. One thing about his paper is that it seems a bit raw in the version that I've read. While there is a lot of info, and does seem to be organized, some of the paragraphs seem very long and in need of being cut down. Another thing is that while he sources his material, he does not really give much information about the source.
One example of this: "According to, Racism and Resistance in New Orleans developed a three tiered racial hierarchy"
He doesn't tell the reader what "Racism and Resistance in New Orleans" is. It could be a book, an article, anything. I don't really know. One thing that he should do is mention what the source is, whether a book, an article or something else.
He doesn't seem to need help with grammer, but there are some mistakes, like the one in the quote given above. He didn't need to add the comma after "According to". Personally though I think that there might be something missing there that he forgot accidentally, like the type of source or the author's name.
The second paper is Rhodine's paper.
The focus of her paper seems to be on Environmental racism mainly in South Bronx.
To me, what seems to be closest to a thesis statement is:
"All these places of a couple of things in common, one they are all places of low income two they are places that get dumped on (literally). Let us focus on the South Bronx. There is a high number of waste facilities and transfer trucks that go through the South Bronx. This is causing some of the highest rates of asthma in the country. The Bronx River is getting better but still needs a lot of work. We as citizens of this city and the world should take action and help change this situation.
Environmental racism is when one particular group, usually people of low income have to take on the burden of caring for another group’s environmental mess. "
I know what her paper is about, but I think that she needs to add a sentence or two making the thesis statement clear. And add that before going into details about South Bronx. Maybe change the wording a bit.
The format of the paper seems okay, but I think that she should add the definition of Environmental racism before talking about South Bronx.
Overall her topic is really interesting to me and I would definitely like to read more of it to understand the subject better.
I don't really know if my opinions are good or helpful, but I've mentioned all of the issues that I found important about the papers.
Sunday, May 11, 2008
Ongoings
So far, I've collected a lot of online articles filled with facts for my paper. What I'm doing now is putting these facts together and forming my paper. The focus of my paper is going to be on racism against the African Americans in New Orleans after Katrina. I'm also going to talk about how it affects them and try to give the opinions of some of the people living there about how they feel about it.
For the dialogue, I know what I'm going to write about, but I am a bit worried about the fact that it might not turn out that long. I was wondering if it can be around 2 to 2 1/2 pages long.
For the dialogue, I know what I'm going to write about, but I am a bit worried about the fact that it might not turn out that long. I was wondering if it can be around 2 to 2 1/2 pages long.
Sunday, May 4, 2008
Progress Report
My topic is going to be about the Katrina disaster which took place in New Orleans. I'm going to be writing about how the people that lived there (a lot of them poor African Americans) were affected.
The reason that I chose this topic was because it clearly shows that racism still exists. Just because there are now equal writes for all races does not mean that racism has stopped.
So far a lot of my sources are articles written about the issues dealing with Katrina and the racism going on in New Orleans right after Katrina hit.
One thing that I want is to get a book for a sourse for my paper. I plan on going to the library and seeing if I can find a good book on Katrina.
The reason that I chose this topic was because it clearly shows that racism still exists. Just because there are now equal writes for all races does not mean that racism has stopped.
So far a lot of my sources are articles written about the issues dealing with Katrina and the racism going on in New Orleans right after Katrina hit.
One thing that I want is to get a book for a sourse for my paper. I plan on going to the library and seeing if I can find a good book on Katrina.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
